In the March 2022 edition of Consumer Reports Magazine, the 2023 Nissan Z is priced from $38,000-$50,000
I think the black dot just indicates a passing grade, not 100% sure. But nothing about the outgoing 370z in recent years seems to be of much concern. Most owners I know have nothing to complain about, only that at this point it feels aged.The "E" there clearly means estimated, no reason to think CU has any inside dope on the pricing, it's guess.
What do the black dots for reliability in that table signify? Average?
After all its years of production there wasn't really anything left to fix on the 370.I think the black dot just indicates a passing grade, not 100% sure. But nothing about the outgoing 370z in recent years seems to be of much concern. Most owners I know have nothing to complain about, only that at this point it feels aged.
Exactly. They'd basically perfected the vehicle, such as it was. Generally very reliable if left unmolested and mostly stock, from a mechanical standpoint.After all its years of production there wasn't really anything left to fix on the 370.
It was the second lowest warranty repair cost vehicle in their lineup, second only to Frontier.
Did you own a 370Z or any other Z cars?After all its years of production there wasn't really anything left to fix on the 370.
It was the second lowest warranty repair cost vehicle in their lineup, second only to Frontier.
Well said, the new Z sure seems well positioned for success, enough that I wouldn't care to see one in person before taking delivery of mine.It’s basically an updated 370Z with a “new” engine from the Infiniti Q60 Red Sport which has been out for years. I think the only significant issues with the new Z will be infotainment as well as fit and finish issues being a new car. All told, a safe-ish bet on decent first-year reliability. That said, the 2nd and 3rd years of production almost always have fewer squeaks, rattles and other minor nuisances, plus a year or two from now prices will normalize so patience will definitely pay off.
I bought a 96 Maxima SE (auto for the wife) new back in 95. I got 165k miles from it before selling it to a college student for $3500 in 2004. The following generation shared its high quality and reliability scores but the generation after that was BUTT UGLY and reliability went down where it stayed until recently, based on J.D. Power’s initial quality study. Bear in mind that initial quality is only when the car is new and has nothing to do with long term reliability.Well said, the new Z sure seems well positioned for success, enough that I wouldn't care to see one in person before taking delivery of mine.
Interestingly, the Maxima lead a quality study by J.D. Power back in mid-2021:
Nissan Maxima is industry's top performer in J.D. Power 2021 Initial Quality Study. NASHVILLE – The results are in and Nissan has recorded remarkable gains in the J.D. Power 2021 Initial Quality Study (IQS) awards, including three top segment rankings out of seven eligible Nissan nameplates. Aug 31, 2021
.![]()
Nissan Maxima is industry’s top performer in J.D. Power 2021 Initial Quality Study
The results are in and Nissan has recorded remarkable gains in the J.D. Power 2021 Initial Quality Study (IQS) awards, including three top segment rankings out of seven eligible Nissan nameplates.usa.nissannews.com
Welcome to the forum. I can see it get a bad as markups seen with the A90 Supra, or worse.I wonder what the dealer markup will be? I was in the process of getting a Civic SI until my wife got into an accident and the dealer was cool enough to let me shift my reserve downpayment on a lot car. But some of the Civic SI's are going for $5k to $7k over sticker price and god knows what things will be like in 6 months when the Z hits the dealerships. So I'm wondering if we're going to get robbed at the dealerships. Does anyone know if Nissan tries to regulate dealer markups or is it all fair game?
I was surprised the Supra was as hot as it was when it debuted given its looks (bad), BMW guts (questionable reliability & expensive repair/maintenance) and the lack of a manual transmission. The Z doesn’t have any of those problems - it’s better-looking, it’s really a Japanese Nissan (more reliable and cheaper to maintain) and can be had with a stick. On top of that, it’s cheaper than the Supra ever was. Given today’s geo-political upheaval, ongoing supply chain issues and mundane cars CONTINUING to sell for more than MSRP, I have to believe that most Z’s will go for MSRP+ though there has been some anecdotal evidence on this board indicating MSRP and below is possible but that’ll be the exception, not the rule.Welcome to the forum. I can see it get a bad as markups seen with the A90 Supra, or worse.
View attachment 5722
View attachment 5723
The A90 is a great sports car and that might be why it sells well enough. It also helps that after 20 years of no Supra, a new demographic of sports car buyers are around and don't care that it's not a true Supra.I was surprised the Supra was as hot as it was when it debuted given its looks (bad), BMW guts (questionable reliability & expensive repair/maintenance) and the lack of a manual transmission. The Z doesn’t have any of those problems - it’s better-looking, it’s really a Japanese Nissan (more reliable and cheaper to maintain) and can be had with a stick. On top of that, it’s cheaper than the Supra ever was. Given today’s geo-political upheaval, ongoing supply chain issues and mundane cars CONTINUING to sell for more than MSRP, I have to believe that most Z’s will go for MSRP+ though there has been some anecdotal evidence on this board indicating MSRP and below is possible but that’ll be the exception, not the rule.
In addition to the previous Supra complaints, how about this: It can’t be driven with the windows open because of unbearable wind buffeting. It’s a known flaw for which Toyota has no fix. Google “Supra buffeting”. If they called the MKV ANYTHING other than a Supra, it might be perceived as a better car. As is, it’s not even close to as good as the Z - and that’s before it’s even tested.The A90 is a great sports car and that might be why it sells well enough. It also helps that after 20 years of no Supra, a new demographic of sports car buyers are around and don't care that it's not a true Supra.
It might help to start getting dealers to commit to MSRP in writing.
The wind buffeting issue is inexcusable. I recall reading about it in the early automotive reviews of the 2020 A90s. That's such a basic thing that should have been noticed during numerous phases of development. It has taken the aftermarket to correct the problem, which is sad.In addition to the previous Supra complaints, how about this: It can’t be driven with the windows open because of unbearable wind buffeting. It’s a known flaw for which Toyota has no fix. Google “Supra buffeting”. If they called the MKV ANYTHING other than a Supra, it might be perceived as a better car. As is, it’s not even close to as good as the Z - and that’s before it’s even tested.
Holly F... I can understand it being a "Premium Launch Edition" but no way in hell that's worth a $50k + markup. That's just being stupid. Do the dealers understand that adding a "market adjustment" like that is going to stop people from buying the car? Look what happened to the CTS-V, they marked it up to the point where people that would otherwise be in the market for it said the hell with it and either went with a Vette or went with something non-GM. I can wait a few years if a Z with a NISMO package is going to be marked up beyond common sense. It might even make me not get the car and look into something else. So I'm hoping they don't go full dumbass.Welcome to the forum. I can see it get a bad as markups seen with the A90 Supra, or worse.
View attachment 5722
View attachment 5723
I sure hope so. Good to see Nissan's product guy make a post like this.Is Jonathan Buhler leaving us a hint of what could come this week? Maybe Price Release and more information?
View attachment 5734
The real dumbasses the one that pays the stupid mark up.Holly F... I can understand it being a "Premium Launch Edition" but no way in hell that's worth a $50k + markup. That's just being stupid. Do the dealers understand that adding a "market adjustment" like that is going to stop people from buying the car? Look what happened to the CTS-V, they marked it up to the point where people that would otherwise be in the market for it said the hell with it and either went with a Vette or went with something non-GM. I can wait a few years if a Z with a NISMO package is going to be marked up beyond common sense. It might even make me not get the car and look into something else. So I'm hoping they don't go full dumbass.