Joined
·
1,398 Posts
Yep!did anyone notice Tamura used launch control at the 50 sec mark in the first video?
That should be a lot of fun.Remind me I need to invest in a new GoPro when I get my Z for autocross runs. I like the C pillar mount angle the best personally
Na the potenzas RE050 on the performance I think will be fine for my purposesThat should be a lot of fun.
Are you planning to get stickier tires or any other upgrades to improve performance?
In this video you get a good look at the steering wheel and it is apparent that the shape of the wheel (the cross-section) is not the least bit ergonomic. It is horrible in fact. At 1:15 you see it very well. In cross-section, the steering wheel is flat at some locations on the circumference and has a tight radius of curvature at other locations on the circumference. The location where the radius of curvature is tightest is at the top and facing mostly toward the driver but a little higher. This is the location where the driver's palms naturally fall to the wheel, and as such this is the location where the cross-section should be flat. The way it is designed makes not sense at all. The person who is responsible for this most likely was someone in an executive position with final say but who likely had little to do with the engineering of the car. It is aggravating to me to think that I would buy a new car and have to deal with something like this.
According to interviews with Nissan designers, the steering wheel design is based on the GT-R steering wheel. The GT-R design was very likely designed with input from the drivers of their GT racing series cars.In this video you get a good look at the steering wheel and it is apparent that the shape of the wheel (the cross-section) is not the least bit ergonomic. It is horrible in fact. At 1:15 you see it very well. In cross-section, the steering wheel is flat at some locations on the circumference and has a tight radius of curvature at other locations on the circumference. The location where the radius of curvature is tightest is at the top and facing mostly toward the driver but a little higher. This is the location where the driver's palms naturally fall to the wheel, and as such this is the location where the cross-section should be flat. The way it is designed makes not sense at all. The person who is responsible for this most likely was someone in an executive position with final say but who likely had little to do with the engineering of the car. It is aggravating to me to think that I would buy a new car and have to deal with something like this.
I just spent a little bit of time looking closely at a whole bunch of pictures of the GT-R steering wheel. You could also have done this. There is some similarity, but they aren't the same at all. The steering wheel on the new Z is a sort of greatly exaggerated incarnation of the GT-R steering wheel. And I looked as some pictures of the Nismo GT-R wheel, which is covered with synthetic suede, and it does not have this effect at all. It is very obviously round in cross-section just as it should be. You hypothesized that the GT-R wheel was designed with input from drivers of Nissan GT racing cars. Even if that were true, it would not be a reason for why either the GT-R or the new Z should used that same wheel. But I doubt that it is true at all, and even if someone within Nissan said this, it would not mean much. And if it is true, the question that then begs to be asked is why that racing steering wheel would have been copied for the GT-R and later the new Z, but not for the Nismo GT-R. This would be a very peculiar thing, and it probably means that the steering wheel in the GT-R was not actually designed to be like the steering wheel in Nissan racing cars. I think it is a fairly safe bet that racing car drivers would not tolerate a steering wheel with cross-section shape like the one we see in the new Z. This is something that was cooked by someone who was trying too hard to do something original and clever and who completely lost sight of functionality. It is very apparent from several pictures and from this video that the part of the wheel where cross-section radius of curvature is smallest (the curvature is least flat) is the part where the palms of the driver's hands fall naturally to the wheel, whenever the driver places his hands on the 12 o'clock position of the wheel. In the past I have driven other cars that were similar to this, that had a steering wheel that was supposed to be a "kidney-shaped" wheel, and it was counter to comfort. It just didn't make any sense, and it isn't surprising that a car manufacturer would do something that very obviously is counter to what makes sense, because car manufacturers very often do things that are counter to what makes sense. For whatever reason, most owners are silent about this kind of thing even after having the product for years.According to interviews with Nissan designers, the steering wheel design is based on the GT-R steering wheel. The GT-R design was very likely designed with input from the drivers of their GT racing series cars.
I have actually sat in this car and put my hands on the wheel. It didn't feel unnatural to me, but personal opinion counts for a lot when buying a car.
I just spent a little bit of time looking closely at a whole bunch of pictures of the GT-R steering wheel. You could also have done this. There is some similarity, but they aren't the same at all. The steering wheel on the new Z is a sort of greatly exaggerated incarnation of the GT-R steering wheel. And I looked as some pictures of the Nismo GT-R wheel, which is covered with synthetic suede, and it does not have this effect at all. It is very obviously round in cross-section just as it should be. You hypothesized that the GT-R wheel was designed with input from drivers of Nissan GT racing cars. Even if that were true, it would not be a reason for why either the GT-R or the new Z should used that same wheel. But I doubt that it is true at all, and even if someone within Nissan said this, it would not mean much. And if it is true, the question that then begs to be asked is why that racing steering wheel would have been copied for the GT-R and later the new Z, but not for the Nismo GT-R. This would be a very peculiar thing, and it probably means that the steering wheel in the GT-R was not actually designed to be like the steering wheel in Nissan racing cars. I think it is a fairly safe bet that racing car drivers would not tolerate a steering wheel with cross-section shape like the one we see in the new Z. This is something that was cooked by someone who was trying too hard to do something original and clever and who completely lost sight of functionality. It is very apparent from several pictures and from this video that the part of the wheel where cross-section radius of curvature is smallest (the curvature is least flat) is the part where the palms of the driver's hands fall naturally to the wheel, whenever the driver places his hands on the 12 o'clock position of the wheel. In the past I have driven other cars that were similar to this, that had a steering wheel that was supposed to be a "kidney-shaped" wheel, and it was counter to comfort. It just didn't make any sense, and it isn't surprising that a car manufacturer would do something that very obviously is counter to what makes sense, because car manufacturers very often do things that are counter to what makes sense. For whatever reason, most owners are silent about this kind of thing even after having the product for years.
Maybe the Nismo GT-R steering wheel is compatible with the new Z steering wheel. If so, this may be the solution, although it will add $$ to the cost of the new vehicle, on top of the "market adjustment" that the dealerships will undoubtedly add on top of MSRP.
I had read that write-up from that site, back around October or November. It annoyed me, and it still does. It isn't written like an independent review. It is written like something that might have come out of Nissan's marketing department. The "fat tube" often equipped in modern sporty cars is preferred by many people, possibly by the majority but this is impossible to say because to the best of my knowledge no proper, independent survey has ever been made. Yet, that sentence is worded in way that asserts via insinuation that the "fat tube" is inherently inferior. To me, this style of writing is disingenuous. If the person who wrote wanted to assert that the "fat tube" is inherently inferior, which clearly this person did want to assert, he should have said this in a much more direct way. Also, the fact that this author described it as "another brilliant tactile detail" means nothing at all. I could not even begin to count the number of times over the decades I've read some automotive journalist heaping praise on something that some manufacturer did, when it was apparent to intelligent readers that is was simply marketing spiel disseminated through an automotive journalist. The appearance of independent assessment is phony, and the reasons for this have been well documented numerous times over the years.![]()
What we learned from seeing the production Nissan Z in person
We recently got the chance to see the new production Nissan Z in person. Nissan let us pop the hood, sit in the car, talk to its chief engineer — everything short of drive it. But despite the lack …japanesenostalgiccar.com
From the article. Tamura san is the chief engineer for the GT-R and has been one of the driving forces behind the new Z.
"Another brilliant tactile detail can be found in the steering wheel. It’s not the fat tube often equipped in modern sporty cars, but it has an oblong cross-section that is easy to grip and nudges your hands into a comfortable resting angle. Tamura-san says that the shape is very close to, but not quite, that of the steering wheel in an R32 Skyline GT-R. He owns a tuned R32 himself, and hopes that the steering wheel will make many Nissan owners in Japan feel instantly at home when they put their hands on it."